leopard slug opal cock
Reading about the shift in media coverage of Christine is heartbreaking. Originally, the journalists were under the impression that Christine had been born with some sort of ‘malady’ that surgery had corrected. The implication being that Christine had been born as some sort of ‘imperfect’ woman that had ‘passed’ as male, perhaps as what we would today refer to as intersex. They went on about how impressive it was that this bastion of All-American maleness had suffered and finally science had saved her and turned her body into the form it should have been. The articles went on about how perfectly feminine and lovely Christine was, I remember one even likening her to Marilyn Monroe.
When it came to light that this was not the case, that Christine had been perfectly ‘male’ at birth, media coverage took an ugly turn. Science was no longer a savior, she was no longer a lovely lady. She was a fraud and a cheat.
I hate that this sense of being ‘lied’ to still surrounds trans* people, that others ask about your ‘real’ gender, or your ‘real’ name. I hate hearing people say things like “You can hardly tell they used to be a man,” or “I couldn’t tell what they were,” or “The voice tipped me off.”
No.
This is real.
This is what I am.
You don’t get to decide.
Male, female, transgender, genderqueer, intersex, any name I choose to use or identify with is mine to choose and yours to respect.

Reading about the shift in media coverage of Christine is heartbreaking. Originally, the journalists were under the impression that Christine had been born with some sort of ‘malady’ that surgery had corrected. The implication being that Christine had been born as some sort of ‘imperfect’ woman that had ‘passed’ as male, perhaps as what we would today refer to as intersex. They went on about how impressive it was that this bastion of All-American maleness had suffered and finally science had saved her and turned her body into the form it should have been. The articles went on about how perfectly feminine and lovely Christine was, I remember one even likening her to Marilyn Monroe.

When it came to light that this was not the case, that Christine had been perfectly ‘male’ at birth, media coverage took an ugly turn. Science was no longer a savior, she was no longer a lovely lady. She was a fraud and a cheat.

I hate that this sense of being ‘lied’ to still surrounds trans* people, that others ask about your ‘real’ gender, or your ‘real’ name. I hate hearing people say things like “You can hardly tell they used to be a man,” or “I couldn’t tell what they were,” or “The voice tipped me off.”

No.

This is real.

This is what I am.

You don’t get to decide.

Male, female, transgender, genderqueer, intersex, any name I choose to use or identify with is mine to choose and yours to respect.

Source: karenserenity.com

Notes

  1. mackinyohoe reblogged this from man--child
  2. violet-catmint reblogged this from freesamuel
  3. paroxysme reblogged this from freesamuel
  4. freesamuel reblogged this from fuzzyhorns and added:
    Reading about the shift in media coverage of Christine is heartbreaking. Originally, the journalists were under the...
  5. candycuntmag reblogged this from fuzzyhorns
  6. cuntunicorn reblogged this from poeticness
  7. poeticness reblogged this from fuzzyhorns
  8. fuzzyhorns reblogged this from man--child
  9. a-great-big-bloody-lie reblogged this from man--child
  10. man--child posted this

← Previous Post Next Post →

About

Beckett

trans* genderqueer

they/their pronouns

feminist artist psychology major

twenty-one years in the making

currently under construction

release date to be determined

NSFW

my posts range from humor, political ranting, personal ramblings, all kinds of art and lots and lots of naked people fucking.

Deal with it


Ask me anything

Ask

Connect