leopard slug opal cock
sugarcreamcandy:

freesamuel:

sugarcreamcandy:

genderqueer:

These are not indecent.

but a dick is? Mens tits are allowed in public simply because they are not considered a reproductive organ. I feel like this argument is super stupid

breasts aren’t reproductive organs, they are secondary sex characteristics. they may be used to nourish the products of reproduction (babies) but they aren’t an integral part of reproduction. if the ability to lactate makes breasts a sex organ then men’s breasts are sex organs too, since some men are capable of lactating.
that said, I see nothing wrong with nudity in general, for either gender. I do feel that the double-standard for going topless further reinforces the arbitrary gender binary.

What I meant was that they are used as part of the baby makin process. Therefor people see them as a sex object. Anything that is part of that is typically deemed not indecent but ‘adult’ . Therefore not being appropriate to walk around with them completely exposed.
Im on the fence though. I am all for nudity, and personally would love to be able to take off my shirt sometimes. But at the same time I do feel like boobs are part of the sex organ group and im not sure how i would feel if i had a kid and some one was walking around topless. I know I wouldnt walk around topless infront of my family. Plus as much as i am for equal rights i feel like theres a lot of differences between male breast and women breast.

But breasts aren’t a part of the baby-making process — they are a part of the baby-caring process. The idea that breasts must be sexual divorces them from their biological purpose.
There isn’t a lot of difference between the male and female breast in my mind — they’re both sacks of fat with the propensity to lactate. And what of ‘male’ and ‘female’? Are the breasts of a transman that hasn’t undergone top-surgery subject to the ‘rules’ of female breast exposure? Is there some sort of cup size cut off? If a cismale can fill a B-cup, should he wear a shirt?
I think that levels of comfort with nudity have to do with socialization. If you were raised in culture where nudity was common and unremarkable, it wouldn’t bother you. You would be used to casual nudity and it wouldn’t have the same connection to sex and shame that t has in many Western cultures.
Nudity and being sexual are not intrinsically linked. One can be fully clothed and completely sexual or completely naked and in no way sexual.

sugarcreamcandy:

freesamuel:

sugarcreamcandy:

genderqueer:

These are not indecent.

but a dick is? Mens tits are allowed in public simply because they are not considered a reproductive organ. I feel like this argument is super stupid

breasts aren’t reproductive organs, they are secondary sex characteristics. they may be used to nourish the products of reproduction (babies) but they aren’t an integral part of reproduction. if the ability to lactate makes breasts a sex organ then men’s breasts are sex organs too, since some men are capable of lactating.

that said, I see nothing wrong with nudity in general, for either gender. I do feel that the double-standard for going topless further reinforces the arbitrary gender binary.

What I meant was that they are used as part of the baby makin process. Therefor people see them as a sex object. Anything that is part of that is typically deemed not indecent but ‘adult’ . Therefore not being appropriate to walk around with them completely exposed.

Im on the fence though. I am all for nudity, and personally would love to be able to take off my shirt sometimes. But at the same time I do feel like boobs are part of the sex organ group and im not sure how i would feel if i had a kid and some one was walking around topless. I know I wouldnt walk around topless infront of my family. Plus as much as i am for equal rights i feel like theres a lot of differences between male breast and women breast.

But breasts aren’t a part of the baby-making process — they are a part of the baby-caring process. The idea that breasts must be sexual divorces them from their biological purpose.

There isn’t a lot of difference between the male and female breast in my mind — they’re both sacks of fat with the propensity to lactate. And what of ‘male’ and ‘female’? Are the breasts of a transman that hasn’t undergone top-surgery subject to the ‘rules’ of female breast exposure? Is there some sort of cup size cut off? If a cismale can fill a B-cup, should he wear a shirt?

I think that levels of comfort with nudity have to do with socialization. If you were raised in culture where nudity was common and unremarkable, it wouldn’t bother you. You would be used to casual nudity and it wouldn’t have the same connection to sex and shame that t has in many Western cultures.

Nudity and being sexual are not intrinsically linked. One can be fully clothed and completely sexual or completely naked and in no way sexual.

Notes

  1. zemonstashaus reblogged this from genderqueer
  2. sixxwaystosunday reblogged this from sometimearoundmidnight
  3. soptastic reblogged this from kezekin
  4. kezekin reblogged this from asspap
  5. sarahjoblow reblogged this from capableme
  6. endingpovertythroughfeminism reblogged this from genderqueer
  7. actyourrage reblogged this from queerio19
  8. cuddl3tastic reblogged this from jerrymojo2
  9. agirlinacrazyworld reblogged this from darkknight-ryan
  10. captainninja-squirrelpixie reblogged this from sirens-temptation
  11. flyingbeds reblogged this from jerrymojo2
  12. keemarasteaparty reblogged this from undeadtrolls
  13. sumomomochi reblogged this from offensiveowl
  14. saviorofthewankingworld reblogged this from zemmer
  15. andyandme reblogged this from attack-of-the-wolf-king
  16. aetheria reblogged this from dinobuttz
  17. dinobuttz reblogged this from attack-of-the-wolf-king
  18. attack-of-the-wolf-king reblogged this from smussol and added:
    I finally get to use this
  19. smussol reblogged this from henryjdoe and added:
    The point is: Women walking around shirtless is considered indecent, no matter the size of their breasts
  20. zoe-is-awk reblogged this from lieutenant-dani
  21. henryjdoe reblogged this from blu-masonjar
  22. oh-my-odinson reblogged this from hannah-ler
  23. tentacle-twat reblogged this from verityinspades

← Previous Post Next Post →

About

Call me Mx. Ess Beckett, Beckett for short

trans* genderqueer

they/their pronouns

whitey mcwhiterson, so if you catch me sayin' privileged shit, call me out

neuroatypical

BDSM switch

feminist artist psychology major

twenty-one years in the making

currently under construction

release date to be determined

NSFW

my posts range from humor, political ranting, personal ramblings, all kinds of art and lots and lots of naked people fucking. Trigger warnings used on some

Deal.


Ask me anything

Ask

Connect